Pedophile beaten, unfortunately still alive…..

Story. This does my heart good. The people standing up and saying we will not accept this abhorrent behavior. We will not stand by as you try to ruin our children. Does the title seem a little rough? Too bad. There should be a price to pay for harming children, a huge price. With the liberal judges these days, sometimes you have to do what is right. In this case, the beating the crap out of a low life pedophile. He was booked on charges of “suspicion of harmful display to a minor.” He was basically showing his porn to kids. What a sicko. I hope he gets the chair. Actually, I hope he gets shived in jail, so we do not have to pay for his death. Brandon Scott Burke You deserve everything you get.

Is Bin Laden dead? What now?

Story. The French Intelligence (that makes me laugh just typing it) thinks so, according to leaked information. They are taking their info from the Saudi secret service, who says he died from a severe case of typhoid. Due to his remote location (because he would be shot if he showed his face) he was unable to get treatment. Not as satisfying as putting a bullet in him, but dead is dead. Of course, no one is really sure if the information is true. The US can’t confirm it. Al Qaeda hasn’t mentioned it yet. So we wait to see what happens next. This is a really good question. What now? There has been so much effort put into killing this guy. There has been so much fighting between the parties about how to get him, who let him go when, why haven’t we got him yet. Is the death of Bin Laden going to make that much of a difference? This is a highly organized group. Everyone in the group is focused on a single goal. Bin Laden may have been the one that got things rolling, but I don’t know how necessary he is now. I have not been able to see much difference in Iraq since al-Zarqawi was bombed to Allah. I don’t think there will be much difference with Bin Laden gone. There maybe a short period of in-fighting to take control, or maybe not. We must remember, this is not a political force, this is a cult. Brain washing helps to get rid of a lot of the in-fighting, back-stabbing, positioning we see in our own government. They just move everyone up a rung and continue killing us. Hopefully, I am wrong. Bin Laden is dead and Al Qaeda will slowly decay into the dust. The world will be safer. We can get on to other important issues. We can finally stop seeing pictures of him with his goats. The left can stop holding over the administration that we haven’t caught him yet. Though, I am sure the left is already saying that somehow Karl Rove went to Pakistan and sneezed on Bin Laden in the secret cell where the republicans have kept him until election time. They will try and find negative in it. They have a knack for that. I would love to hear from you, the readers, what you believe will happen if Bin Laden is dead. Will it make a difference in the war on terror, or will we just be seeing a new unwashed bearded face as enemy number one.

UPDATED: Pro-Israel (anti-Iran) Rally in front of U(seless)N

Did you know that? Evidently 35,000 to 40,000 pro-Israel people came to protest the UN yesterday in New York. They closed down streets. They held up signs. They got completely ignored by the media. You know how I found out about it. Little Green Footballs (Be sure to check out the slideshow) And Atlas Shrugs (Wonderful pictures there too) (I highly recommend both these blogs on a daily basis.) I actually found both these stories yesterday. I decided to do a quick news search to get some more background. You know try a little due diligence, but alas, I found no stories on the rally in the MSM. 35,000 – 45,000 people protesting the beloved President of Iran and the anti-Semitic U(seless)N, and nothing. I checked the usual places. I ran a google search, nothing. Now I realize that most of the MSM was busy reporting about Hugo Chavez calling the President “el Diablo” as that fits in better with their beliefs, but still there should be something. If one anti-Israel protester showed up and just sat around for a few hours, they would have hundreds of cameras on him as proof how the “whole” world hates us and Israel. Ok. I figure I’ll just wait until the morning. Let everyone catch up with the news. Google news search this morning showed zilch. I even went to Fox News and searched. NADA there either. I guess I should be surprised, but I am not. Everyday the MSM lets down the people of this country by only reporting what fits its agenda. Unfortunately, freedom of the press also means freedom not to report. UPDATE: I found a story. Goodfor the NY Sun for actually picking up this story.

The U(seless)N shows its impotency....

Two articles show the impotency of the UN. If not their out right alliance with the Terrorists. First Kofi Annan evidently told Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad not to worry about the UN resolution. Iranian President Mamoud Ahmadinejad said in a news conference yesterday, "We didn't understand and couldn't understand why a resolution was passed in the midst of an examination of a package," Ahmadinejad said. "We think [the Security Council] was probably under pressure by some powers who constantly want to place pressure on countries. The secretary-general told me to disregard what has happened for the time being, resort to diplomacy." Of course Kofi is denying it, but with his track record personally and the track record of the U(seless)N why should we believe him? The U(seless)N has been shown again and again to be anti-American, so it should not surprise anyone that Kofi would take a personal part in re-assuring a terrorist state. Second, the Hezbollah puppet Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, told a crowd of anti-Israel, anti-American terrorists that they would not lay down their weapons as they promised the U(seless)N they would do. Once again, Israel follows the orders of the UN and the terrorists do not. How many times does this have to happen until they figure it out. Unless of course, Kofi spoke with Nasrallah also. The conversation probably sounded like this. Nasrallah: We are getting our butts kicked here, can’t the UN stop this? Annan: Sure. We’ll come up with a cease-fire, you’ll say you’re disarming. We’ll bring in a bunch of “peace keepers”. We’ll march those Zionist bastards back across the line. Nasrallah: No way will we disarm. Annan: Don’t worry. I said you will SAY you’ll disarm. Noone expects you to do it. Nasrallah: Well, OK. But I don’t like the idea of blue hats either. Annan: We’ll make them Fwench, those guys will run from a breeze. Nasrallah: Very good. Oh by the way can you ask Mamoud and Assad to send some missiles. We are really low. Annan: No problem. Just sit tight for a month until after the UN meeting, then fire away.

UPDATED: Hugo Chavez at the U(seless)N

UPDATE: The more I think about this the madder I get. Why is this man allowed to walk around in our country? If his hatred of America is that bad, then he needs to leave. And I have a list of people that can go with him, (cough(Cindy Sheehan)cough). The liberals in this country keep saying we need to be diplomatic with these people, to sit and talk with them. Yet, these are the kind of people we would have to talk too. How do you open a worthwhile discussion with a man who calls the President, "el diablo"? And where is the outrage in the country from him saying these things. Why is there not bill in Congress to deny him passage back here, ever. When President Clinton is the only one who seems to stand up and say something, then there is a major problem with the rest of the government here in America, both Democrat and Republican. Update #2 - Nancy Pelosi spoke against Chavez in the Presidents defense. Good for her. What he said should be offensive to all Americans, regardless of where you fall politically. Rep. Rangel also spoke out, RANGEL: AN ATTACK ON BUSH IS AN ATTACK ON ALL AMERICANS... 'You do not come into my country, my congressional district, and you do not condemn my president. If there is any criticism of President Bush, it should be restricted to Americans, whether they voted for him or not. I just want to make it abundantly clear to Hugo Chavez or any other president, do not come to the United States and think because we have problems with our president that any foreigner can come to our country and not think that Americans do not feel offended when you offend our Chief of State'... Where are the REPUBLICANS? Update #3 Chavez invokes the "devil" comment again. Speaking while walking in a Harlem street, Chavez told a group of passers-by: "Bush is an alcoholic, a sick man with a lot of hang-ups." "He walks like John Wayne," declared the left-wing Venezuelan leader. "He doesn't know anything about politics, he got there because of Daddy." Bush's father, George Bush, was also a US president. Story Castro’s bitch decided to speak at the UN today. His rhetoric was tiresome and predictable. It was a cross between Castro and Ahmadinejad. He called Bush “the Devil”. Said he could still smell brimstone at the podium. I believe he picked that line up from Ahmadinejad. Chavez called U.S. "imperialism" a menace. Hmmm. That would be from Castro. I did agree with him on one item. He said they should move the U(seless)N out of the US. I completely agree. We should stop supporting U(seless)N completely. The should get the hell out of our country. They are as solidly anti-American as Chavez is. He is starting to become dangerous. He is quickly becoming a dictator in his own country, he is spending the extra money gained from high oil prices on trying to make himself look better to the world. He says he is a fighter for Third world countries. But look at the reason these countries are still Third World, because of people like him. Their countries should be rich from the oil and other natural resources, but instead the dictators and “rulers” of these countries take everything (in the name of socialism). They spend money flying around the world in luxury, spending time with other dictators, rubbing each others shoulders and making outrageous comments, usually about the US. Why? They know how bad their countries are, they don’t want to live their either. They figure if they can keep their people outraged against the US, blaming us for all their problems, they won’t notice the truth. Don’t worry Chavez, we got your number.

House Bill passes to require ID at voting booths, despite Dems.

Story Oh how the libs give me a headache these days. The House passed a bill today that would require people to show a photo ID when voting in the next presidential election. Why is this even a question? Here’s how the voting broke down: “The Federal Election Integrity Act was approved on a nearly party-line 228-196 vote. Republicans backed the bill 224-3, with three nonvoters; Democrats opposed it 192-4, with five nonvoters. They were joined in opposition by the House's one independent member.” The libs said that this would stop old people and minorities (man they love those two groups) from voting as many of them did not have IDs and could not afford them. The republicans added a provision that these would then be provided for free. The libs didn’t care. Why? Because, this stops one of the largest section of Democratic voters from being able to vote, mainly the illegal immigrants. The liberals do not want any bill passed that can make the elections better. If that happens then what will they complain about when they lose. "Show me the examples of the problem you're trying to solve," demanded Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat who accused Republicans of trying to appeal to the "fear and -- yes, perhaps -- the prejudices of people." There we go, blaming the Republicans of being racists. That’s original. Rep. John Lewis, Georgia Democrat, called the bill a "modern-day poll tax" and charged that the bill "is nothing less than voter suppression." Yes, that’s correct. We are suppressing the vote of those people who do not have a right to vote in our country. Not like the liberals tried to suppress the military vote. If they had there way they would open voting booths in Iran and Venezuela. Perhaps just let the UN nations vote on our leader and take it completely away from Americans. The implication that this is a modern day poll tax is ludicrous and just another attempt to make the Republicans look racist. Just the same old bag of tricks. Unfortunately it will probably work as it has before. The liberals keep going back to it, the black people keep believing the republicans are out to get them, the old folks keep believing the republicans are out to get them and they keep voting in a socialist agenda. This is why they do not have any ideas on what better to do for the country. They just continue to shoot down anything the republicans come up with, using lies and accusations to make themselves look as though they are the saviors of the poor. Can’t the liberals be honest, just once? Is THAT too much to ask for?

Peggy Fox is a left wing partisan hack!!!!!

This is from a debate Wednesday between Sen. Allen and James Webb. A reporter from WUSA in Virginia, Peggy Fox, decided that she needed to know more about Sen. Allen’s mother and Jewish heritage. It is so obviously a liberal ploy to make him look bad. She wants to peg him as a Jew or a Jew hater. She doesn’t seem to care which, figuring she can take away some of his votes either way. The first question she asks is about macaca and whether or not he learned that from his mother, who is from Tunisia. Dragging his mom into the political ring is just wrong, but wait she’s not done. Here is the transcript of the question and answer session: Fox: May I ask a follow up? Following the macaca episode, the Jewish press published a story on the internet that explored your possible Jewish ancestry on your mother's side. You've been quoted as saying your mother's not Jewish, but it had been reported her father, your grandfather Felix, whom you were given your middle name for, was Jewish. Could you please tell us whether your forbearers include Jews, and if so, at which point Jewish identity might have ended? (Booing from the audience) Allen: I'm glad you all have that, you have that reaction. You know what our first freedom in this country was? Freedom of religion, where people's rights are not enhanced or diminished on account of their religious beliefs. Thomas Jefferson was the author of that. As we try to stand up a free and just society, that's the first pillar of a free and just society. And to be getting into what religion my mother is, I don't think it's relevant, whatever one person believes, whatever their beliefs may be, is not relevant. So I'd like to ask you, why is that relevant? My religion, Jim's religion, or the religion beliefs of anyone out there. (applause) My mother's French-Italian-- Fox: Honesty. Allen:--with a little Spanish blood in her. And I was raised as she was, as far as I know, raised as a Christian. But if you really need to get into such matters-- Fox:--Honesty, that's all. Allen: Oh, that's all? That's just all? We need, we need to get this country together. And I respect your right to ask questions. But let's ask questions about issues that really matter to people here, in Virginia, such as how we're going to bring this country together, make us more secure, a land of opportunity. And I'll tell you one other thing, preserve our foundational values, and one of those values is freedom of religion and not making aspersions about people because of their religious beliefs. Wow!!! Is there really anything to be said about this? Yeah, I guess so. Let’s dissect her question: “Following the macaca episode…” She makes sure to mention this “episode again although the last question dealt with it. “…the Jewish press…” As opposed to the press, why does she feel it necessary to mention it as the Jewish press? "…explored your possible Jewish ancestry on your mother's side. You've been quoted as saying your mother's not Jewish, but it had been reported her father, your grandfather Felix, whom you were given your middle name for, was Jewish…” You say your mother isn’t Jewish, but the Jewish press says her dad was… She implies he is lying about his Jewish past, perhaps he is ashamed of it….Perfect set-up to finally get to the question. “…Could you please tell us whether your forbearers include Jews,…” Why she does this I don’t understand, except hoping he might deny it. “…at which point Jewish identity might have ended?” Why oh why have you turned your back on the Jewish religion and the Jewish people, do you hate Israel? Is what she is really asking. I think that Allen did a wonderful job of answering the question. I would have been more succinct. “My mother, my religion, ain’t none of your damn business.” I guess that’s why I am not running for office. Yet.

Time and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Story Scott McLeod of Time went to Cuba this week to interview Ahmadinejad. Why? Well can only speculate for the “Man of the Year” award. Here are a few excerpts: TIME: Do you feel any connection with President Bush, since he is also a religious man, a strong Christian? Ahmadinejad: I've heard about that. But there are many things which take place and are inconsistent with the teachings of Jesus Christ in this world. As opposed to the teachings of Mohammad which says to spread the word by the sword. I guess when the religion you follow allows you to do and say whatever, as long as you say in the name of Allah, you don’t have to learn the teachings of your own religion and can make flippant remarks like this. TIME: Why do your supporters chant "Death to America"? Ahmadinejad: When they chanted that slogan, it means they hate aggression, and they hate bullying tactics, and they hate violations of the rights of nations and discrimination. I recommended to President Bush that he can change his behavior, then everything will change. Really? I always assumed that they meant they hated America. Bullying tactics? You mean like threatening all who will not bow down to be beheaded? TIME: But if Americans shouted "Death to Iran," Iranians would feel insulted. Ahmadinejad: If the government of Iran acted in such a way, then [the American people] have this right. I think this question could be asked a lot better, for example, “But if the Pope quoted a 14th century source about what seems to be the main tenet of your religion, spread the religion by killing everyone, then Iranians would burn effigys, burn churches, and kill Jews.” TIME: Have you considered that Iranian Jews are hurt by your comments denying that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust? Ahmadinejad: As to the Holocaust, I just raised a few questions. And I didn't receive any answers to my questions. I said that during World War II, around 60 million were killed. All were human beings and had their own dignities. Why only 6 million? And if it had happened, then it is a historical event. Then why do they not allow independent research? TIME: But massive research has been done. Ahmadinejad: They put in prison those who try to do research. About historical events everybody should be free to conduct research. Let's assume that it has taken place. Where did it take place? So what is the fault of the Palestinian people? These questions are quite clear. We are waiting for answers. Do you hear that? That’s the coo-coo clock going off.

Jesse Jackson interveiws for Al-Jazeera

Story. Man. This guy cannot stay out of the press. What does he think he is going to accomplish by meeting with the terrorists, except give them quotes as to how horrible America is. You made the list. He toes the liberal line about the cause of terrorism being the US troops in Iraq. How we lied to go in there. How the Iraqis see us as an occupying force and they all hate us. How America makes it all worse by not negotiating with Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria, Iran and other terrorist organizations and countries. But this is the part that gets me. "The war has been a pretext to reduce civil liberties and basic freedoms. You have warlike powers, which mean you suspend freedoms. Then they plan wars based upon an unsound assumption. We have lost money, like $250 million a day, lives, between 2000 and 3000 Americans and 50,000 plus Iraqis, we have lost honour." He said it. Instead of seeing the truth, which is we are bestowing liberties on other countries. We are fighting for democracy. We are giving people a chance to live in a place where they have rights. He says our rights are being taken away. Which right have you lost Jesse? The right to put down America to the enemy? The right to speak against the government? The right to rhyme while keeping your own people down? Try and live in a muslim country where your right is to convert or die. Then lets discuss your freedoms again.

Pope invites discussion - Muslims burn effigy

Pope Benedict invited Muslims on Tuesday to join a dialogue of cultures that agrees the concept of Islamic "holy war" is unreasonable and against God's nature. Their reply: The body of an Italian nun, Sister Leonella Sgorbati. Can you feel the peace?

Pope's Statement VS The Mujahedeen Shura Council

Story Pope: "He said, I quote, 'Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached,'" The Mujahedeen Shura Council:"We will break up the cross, spill the liquor and impose head tax, then the only thing acceptable is a conversion (to Islam) or (killed by) the sword." So what are they upset about? He said they spread their faith by the sword, they said we spread our faith by the sword. Then they shoot nuns in the back, burn churches and make more threats. I almost feel sorry for them being filled with nothing but hatred. Almost.

Updated: More Pope hating...From the religion of Peace...

Update #1: Well it is monday morning and the islamic militants are cranking up there rhetoric against the Pope, America, Israel and Germany. "We shall break the cross and spill the wine ... God will (help) Muslims to conquer Rome ... (May) God enable us to slit their throats, and make their money and descendants the bounty of the mujahideen," said the statement, posted on Sunday on an Internet site often used by al Qaeda and other militant groups. In related news Chirac said, "...we must avoid anything that excites tensions between peoples or between religions" What a wuss. He doesn't understand that we DO NOT have to give in to their tactics of world domination, and if you do, it does not mean they will not kill you anyways. They are barbarians, mindless robots doing the bidding of the few EVIL men in power. They have no intelligence, no conscious and no soul. They are empty vessels being filled with hate by those who are supposed to be blessing them. (Original Story) These people are going crazy. Most of the islamic community is reminding me of a drunken high school boy trying to fight anyone. One thing I wonder that hasn't been brought up, is what about the relationships between say Iran and Venezuela? Iran being Islamic and Venezeula being primarily catholic. It would seem relations should be strained there, but instead these ignorant animals simply use it as another excuse to hate Americans and Europeans. "We swear that we will destroy their cross in the heart of Rome ... and that their Vatican will be hit and wept over by the Pope," said Jaish al-Mujahideen (the Mujahideen's Army) in the statement, whose authenticity could not be confirmed. Gunmen shot and killed an Italian nun at a children's hospital in Mogadishu on Sunday..."After serious injuries, she died in the hospital treatment room," doctor Ali Mohamed Hassan told Reuters. "She was shot three times in the back." Palestinians wielding guns and firebombs attacked five churches in the West Bank and Gaza on Saturday, following remarks by Pope Benedict that angered many Muslims. "Whoever offends our Prophet Mohammed should be killed on the spot by the nearest Muslim," Malin, a prominent cleric in the Somali capital, told worshippers at a mosque in southern Mogadishu. There are those in the muslim community who think like a logical human being, proving that not all muslims are war mongering Neandertals, just like not all christians are catholic: But the leader of Egypt's largest Islamic political group, the Muslim Brotherhood, told The Associated Press Sunday that "while anger over the Pope's remarks is necessary, it shouldn't last for long." "While he is the head of the Catholic Church in the world, many Europeans are not following [the church] so what he said won't influence them. Our relations with Christians should remain good, civilized and cooperative," Mohammed Mahdi Akef said. Unfortunately, I am sure I will be updating this today. The Pope has apologized, the muslims say it isn't enough, and so the the followers of Islam keep proving the Pope right.